This article is the editorial introduction to a special biopolitics-themed issue of the Journal of Medicine & Philosophy. I came across it during my negative results research since one of the issue’s articles uses the term “rejected knowledge.” The table of contents for the entire issue is available here:
Even though this editorial doesn’t perform any biopolitical analysis, itself, I found it interesting since it begins by discussing the simplistic view of biopolitics (the one I entered this course with) as merely bioethics influenced by political ideology. A common complaint about most bioethical writing is that it is strictly descriptive/normative — “this is wrong, we should do that instead.” If a political analysis is included, it doesn’t go much beyond noting “who occupies the White House” (205). It’s nice to know that, at least in this special issue, authors develop their analyses further to include figures we’ve studied this semester: Foucault, Agamben, etc. I’m particularly interested to read the last three articles by Newell, Hall, and Bleakley.